
Let’s pick this up right where the runway lighting system is being treated as a single, integrated system. The key idea here is that the whole lighting installation has to be considered as a whole, not as a collection of independent lights. The intensity of each component must be matched so that the relative light intensities are suitably matched to the same end — meaning the entire system works together to give you a consistent visual picture.
Now, the governing rule: the intensity of runway lighting shall be adequate for the minimum conditions of visibility in ambient light in which use of the runway is intended. Let me unpack that. “Ambient light” is the natural light around you — daylight, twilight, or darkness. The lighting must be bright enough for the worst visibility you’d legally be allowed to use that runway in, under whatever ambient light conditions apply. And it must be compatible with that of the nearest section of the approach lighting system, when an approach lighting system is provided. So the runway lights and the approach lights have to be compatible in intensity where they meet.
Here’s a subtle but important point: the approach lighting may be of higher intensity than the runway lighting — that’s allowed. But it is good practice to avoid abrupt changes in intensity. Why? Because a sudden jump in brightness could give a pilot a false impression that the visibility is changing during approach. In other words, if the lights suddenly get much brighter, you might think the fog has lifted, when actually it’s just the lighting intensity stepping up. That’s a dangerous illusion, so the intensities are matched to prevent it.
Now let’s move to Section 21.5, Intensity Control. Where a high intensity lighting system is provided, a suitable intensity control shall be incorporated to allow for adjustment of the light intensity to meet the prevailing conditions. So you need a control that lets you dim or brighten the lights as conditions change.
And here’s the critical part: separate intensity controls, or other suitable methods, shall be provided to ensure that the following systems, when installed, can be operated at compatible intensities. So each of these systems gets its own control, or a method that achieves the same result, so they can all be set to compatible levels. The list is: the approach lighting system, runway edge lights, runway threshold lights, runway end lights, runway centre line lights, runway touchdown zone lights, and taxiway centre line lights. That’s seven systems, each needing to be adjustable so they can be matched to each other.
Next, Section 21.6, Availability. Lights may be turned off, providing that they can be turned on again within a period of 1 hour. So you’re allowed to switch them off, but you must be able to restore them within one hour. That’s the availability requirement — a one-hour restoration capability.
Finally, Section 21.7, Emergency Lights. Normally, an aerodrome will have an alternate power supply to cope with general power failures. So the standard setup is a backup power source. But where no such back-up supply exists, emergency lights are to be available for at least the primary runway. So if there’s no alternate power supply, you must have emergency lights covering at least the primary runway — the main runway in use.
Let me tie this together. The whole section is about ensuring the lighting system is coherent: intensities matched across approach and runway, adjustable to prevailing conditions, restorable within an hour if turned off, and backed up by emergency lights on the primary runway when there’s no alternate power supply. Each of these is a regulatory requirement designed to give you a consistent, reliable visual reference during approach and landing.
This is one saved preview. Continue from this exact book or paper with BlueFlash voice AI.
Continue in BlueFlash